Digital Tools for Electrical Engineering: The Most Popular and Efficient Simulators
PDF
HTML
ePUB

Keywords

Electrical engineering simulation
power systems
power electronics
digital twins
artificial intelligence
renewable energy systems

Data Availability Statement

No new data were generated or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

How to Cite

Digital Tools for Electrical Engineering: The Most Popular and Efficient Simulators. (2026). Prismalia Journal, 2, 12-26. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21428925

Abstract

The evolution of digital tools in electrical engineering has significantly transformed the way electrical systems are modeled, analyzed, designed, and optimized. The development of specialized software has promoted a methodological shift from predominantly manual procedures toward more accurate, dynamic, and efficient processes based on simulation, modeling, analysis, and control. This article presents a narrative review of the main simulation tools used in electrical engineering, with emphasis on their historical evolution, technical capabilities, applications, advantages, limitations, and emerging trends. The review examines representative software used in academic and industrial contexts, including MATLAB and Simulink, ETAP, DIgSILENT PowerFactory, PSIM, PSpice, Multisim, AutoCAD Electrical, EPLAN, PVsyst, HOMER Pro, and LabVIEW. In addition, the study discusses the influence of artificial intelligence, digital twins, cyber-physical systems, cloud-based simulation, IoT integration, and interoperable platforms on the future development of electrical simulation environments. The findings show that simulation software has become an essential component of contemporary electrical engineering, supporting system behavior prediction, risk reduction, design optimization, renewable energy integration, smart grid development, and decision-making in increasingly complex energy systems. The study concludes that these tools are not only relevant for improving engineering practice and education, but also fundamental for addressing current challenges related to sustainability, energy decentralization, and the transition toward renewable technologies.

PDF
HTML
ePUB

References

Almutairi, R., Bergami, G., & Morgan, G. (2024). Advancements and Challenges in IoT Simulators: A Comprehensive Review. Sensors, 24(5), 1511. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051511

Artibani, F. S. (2025). The Role of Digital Technologies in Promoting the Transition to Decarbonized Energy Systems in Europe and Italy and Their Legal Ramifications. In A. Barichella & J. Yada (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Cybersecurity, Technologies and Energy Transitions (pp. 1–44). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04196-9_46-1

Bali, A., & Mughal, Y. (2023). The Impact of Different Computing Tools in Electrical Engineering Learning. Journal of Engineering and Computational Intelligence Review. https://jecir.com/index.php/jecir/article/view/12

Cerdá, E., André, F. J., & De Castro, L. M. (2012). Las energías renovables en el ámbito internacional. Cuadernos Económicos de ICE, (83). https://doi.org/10.32796/cice.2012.83.6031

Dai, J. (2025). Suggested Approaches to Perform Transient Stability Studies for Industrial and Commercial Power Systems. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 61(3), 4833–4846. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2025.3533500

Fasinu, G. V., & Alant, B. P. (2023). University electronics engineering students’ approaches of integrating mathematical ideas into the learning of physical electronics in basic electronics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), em2214. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12797

Gharehpetian, G. B., Yazdani, A., & Zaker, B. (2023). Power System Transients: Modelling Simulation and Applications. Power System Transients: Modelling Simulation and Applications, 1–234. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003255130

Giedraityte, A., Rimkevicius, S., Marciukaitis, M., Radziukynas, V., & Bakas, R. (2025). Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems—A Review of Optimization Approaches and Future Challenges. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 15(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041744

Kantaros, A., Ganetsos, T., Pallis, E., & Papoutsidakis, M. (2025). From Mathematical Modeling and Simulation to Digital Twins: Bridging Theory and Digital Realities in Industry and Emerging Technologies. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 15(16), 9213. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15169213

Makanju, T. D., Shongwe, T., & Famoriji, O. J. (2024). Machine Learning Approaches for Power System Parameters Prediction: A Systematic Review. IEEE Access, 12, 66646–66679. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3397676

Mohammadi, S. A. D., & Gezegin, C. (2022). Design and Simulation of Grid-Connected Solar PV System Using PVSYST, PVGIS and HOMER Software. International Journal of Pioneering Technology and Engineering, 1(01), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.56158/jpte.2022.24.1.01

Rahmani-Sane, G., Azad, S., Taghi Ameli, M., & Haghani, S. (2025). The Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twin in Power Systems: An In-Depth Review. IEEE Access, 13, 108573–108608. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3580340

Rui, X., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Rong, B., He, B., & Jin, Z. (2022). Multibody system transfer matrix method: The past, the present, and the future. International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics, 2(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/msd2.12037

Schmidt, A., Elagroudy, P., Draxler, F., Kreuter, F., & Welsch, R. (2024). Simulating the Human in HCD with ChatGPT: Redesigning Interaction Design with AI. Interactions, 31(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637436

Sifat, M. M. H., Choudhury, S. M., Das, S. K., Ahamed, M. H., Muyeen, S. M., Hasan, M. M., Ali, M. F., Tasneem, Z., Islam, M. M., Islam, M. R., Badal, M. F. R., Abhi, S. H., Sarker, S. K., & Das, P. (2023). Towards electric digital twin grid: Technology and framework review. Energy and AI, 11, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100213

Swain, A., Abdellatif, E., Mousa, A., & Pong, P. W. T. (2022). Sensor Technologies for Transmission and Distribution Systems: A Review of the Latest Developments. Energies, 15(19), 7339. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197339

UL Solutions. (2026). HOMER Pro: Microgrid Optimization Software. Accessed: Jul. 4, 2026.

Ullrick, T., Deschrijver, D., Spina, D., Bogaerts, W., & Dhaene, T. (2026). Wavelength-tunable equivalent circuit models for SPICE-based photonic–electronic co-simulation. Journal of Computational Electronics, 25(1), 2-. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10825-025-02448-6

Valente, A., Holanda, M., Mariano, A. M., Furuta, R., & Da Silva, D. (2022). Analysis of Academic Databases for Literature Review in the Computer Science Education Field. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962393

van Dinter, R., Tekinerdogan, B., & Catal, C. (2022). Predictive maintenance using digital twins: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 151, 107008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107008

Wu, Q. H., Lin, Y., Hong, C., Su, Y., Wen, T., & Liu, Y. (2023). Transient Stability Analysis of Large-scale Power Systems: A Survey. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 9(4), 1284–1300. https://doi.org/10.17775/CSEEJPES.2022.07110

Zhong, D., Xia, Z., Zhu, Y., & Duan, J. (2023). Overview of predictive maintenance based on digital twin technology. Heliyon, 9(4), e14534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14534

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Santiago Aguaguiña-Alvear, Eugenio Santiago Punina (Author)